Edit Mode: Story Editor Training for Narrative Audio
The Details
- Intensive workshop over six weekends.
- Followed by a month-long mentorship with a minimum one meeting/week with your mentor. Participants will shadow an editor at a news organization or podcast network, gaining first hand experience in the editing process.
- Participants receive a stipend of $1000
JANUARY 21, 2022
Meet the 2022 Edit Mode Fellows
Erisa Apantaku
Tracy Egbas
Bethel Habte
Chris Hambrick
Carolina Hidalgo
Nicole Kelly (NK)
Jed Kim
Rahima Nasa
Elena Rivera
Laura Ubate
Frequently asked questions
Who should apply?
What do you mean by story editor?
I'm interested in editing for audio drama / audio fiction, will this be covered in the training?
Does this program cost money?
What equipment will I need to participate?
What is the time commitment?
- The initial training will span six Saturdays, with a commitment of about 4 hours each day. Participants should also expect to dedicate several hours in between classes to working on edit assignments and meeting with their mentors.
- Members of the Editors Collective will hold optional weekly drop-ins for participants to discuss edits, career paths, and more.
- After the training, there will also be four 90-minute weekly meetings for the cohort to check in about their mentorship experiences, ask questions, and learn from additional guest speakers.
- For a month following the training, participants will also work with their mentors on real-world edits. They should expect to dedicate at least 3-5 hours a week to that experience.
What if I have to miss a class?
How many people will be in the cohort?
I applied last time and wasn't accepted. Can I re-apply?
Will you accept international applications?
Do fellows get to choose their mentors?
Can you give feedback on my application?
We received over 175 applicants for 10 spots. There were obviously more than 10 strong candidates! We had tough decisions to make, but we did our best to design a fair and comprehensive process. We had 8 reviewers, and each application was closely reviewed by 2 of them. Reviewers scored apps numerically according to a rubric.
The rubric has 5 categories:
1-Background and perspective of applicant writing the intentions of the program
2-Emotional/visceral response to the application (this category to capture imaginal/intangible/energetic dimensions of evaluation)
3-Readiness of applicant to engage with the work and curriculum
4- Strength of the overall application inlcuding writing quality and completeness
5-Evaluation of the work sample writing skill + understanding of narrative audio format
Reviewers were then asked to pick top candidates to share with the entire selection committee. Numeric score was a main factor, but not determinative. The selection committee then met to discuss candidates, with access to (re-)review applications if needed.
We considered the strength of individual applications in isolation as well as in the context of building a vibrant, diverse cohort—all informed by the intentions of the program to “diversify the audio industry’s editor pool” and send out job-ready fellows.
No way around it: there were many more great candidates than we had room for. We had some spirited debate within the committee! And just like editing a story, we had to make tough decisions in an agreed-upon time frame. We contacted references for finalists and a waitlist.
We think this cohort is the bee’s knees. And we also know there are many other amazing folks who can’t participate this time around. We hope everyone who wants to be an editor gets to do that, whether it’s through our program or not. This industry needs everyone’s voices!